RECENTINATO TOTINATI MANGISTO v. R (1968) HCD 154
Held:
(1)
“The fraudulent false accounting was part and parcel of the stealing offence.
In such cases, unless there is good reason to the contrary, it is customary to
order the various sentences in respect of the several convictions which are all
part and parcel of the same transaction to run concurrently.”
(2) “The offences
of false accounting were acts of omission. As opposed to commission, which
deserve more lenient treatment. Sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
No comments:
Post a Comment