JAYANTILAL LAVJI KARA SHAH v. R (1968) HCD 328
Held: (1)
All of the counts refer to a single transaction, and consecutive terms of imprisonment
should not have been imposed. “In such cases, the best method of sentencing is
to arrive at an appropriate punishment for the entire transaction and award
concurrent terms to meet each separate count, taking into consideration the maximum
punishment fixed for each by law.”
(2) The jurisdiction of the Senior Resident
Magistrate is limited to passing a sentence of imprisonment for a term not
exceeding three years for any single offence. Sitting on appeal, the High court
cannot pass a sentence higher than that which the trial magistrate could have
passed. Although the term of four years’ imprisonment is not in itself
excessive, the imposition of concurrent terms of imprisonment will result in a
total term of imprisonment of three years. Sentences ordered to run
concurrently.
No comments:
Post a Comment